The Third Place: Ethical Custodianship in Transition

ID: WMA2026_534

Track:

Museums are often seen as permanent stewards…but what if we reimagined our role as temporary, ethical custodians? This session introduces the “Third Place” model, where museums provide culturally responsive interim care for ancestors when direct Tribal possession is not immediately feasible. Grounded in sovereignty, trust, and accountability, this framework reduces barriers to repatriation and reframes stewardship as transitional, collaborative, and community-driven.

Session Information

Format: Regular session/panel (roundtable, single speaker, etc.)

Uniqueness: Repositions museums from permanent holders to accountable interim partners, offering a practical, replicable framework that centers Tribal sovereignty and accelerates ethical repatriation.

Objectives:

By the end of this session, participants will:

  1. Understand the Third Place framework as a practical model for ethical interim custodianship during repatriation processes, particularly when immediate Tribal possession is constrained by logistics, infrastructure, or cultural protocols.
  2. Identify institutional barriers that slow or complicate repatriation efforts and develop strategies for reframing museums as temporary partners rather than permanent holders. Participants will explore how policies, storage practices, and risk management frameworks can be adapted to support transitional care.
  3. Develop actionable steps for building trust-centered partnerships with Tribal Nations in their regions. This includes establishing clear agreements, culturally responsive care practices, and communication structures that uphold sovereignty and accountability.

This session aligns with ASPIRE by challenging inherited definitions of stewardship and encouraging museums to take intentional, transformative steps toward restorative practice. Participants will leave equipped to reimagine their institutional role, not as final authorities, but as collaborators in returning ancestors home with dignity

Engagement: Participants will engage through guided reflection prompts and facilitated discussion on how their institutions currently approach repatriation logistics. We will incorporate scenario-based questions that invite attendees to identify barriers and brainstorm interim custodial models within their own regions. Time will be reserved for open dialogue to encourage cross-institutional connection and shared problem-solving.

Relationship to Theme:

Audience

Audiences: Curators/Scientists/Historians Other Registrars, Collections Managers 

Professional Level: All levels 

Scalability: The Third Place model is adaptable across institution types and sizes. Small museums can serve as regional partners or conveners. Mid-sized institutions may provide short-term storage under culturally informed agreements. Large institutions can revise policy frameworks and allocate resources to support transitional care networks. Because the model centers relationship-building rather than scale-dependent infrastructure, it is replicable in rural, urban, Tribal, and multi-institutional contexts throughout the West. Its emphasis on accountability and sovereignty makes it relevant across diverse governance structures.

Participants

Tamara Serrao-Leiva (Submitter)
Chief Deputy
San Bernardino County Museum

Redlands, CA

Tamara Serrao-Leiva is not presenting.

Tamara Serrao-Leiva (Panelist)
Chief Deputy
San Bernardino County Museum

Redlands, CA
tserrao-leiva@sbcm.sbcounty.gov

(confirmed)

Kara Vetter (Panelist)
Director of Cultural Resources
Museum of Us

San Diego, CA
kvetter@museumofus.org

(confirmed)

Xitlaly Madrigal (Panelist)
NAGPRA Supervisor
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians

Palm Springs, CA
xmadrigal@aguacaliente.net

(not confirmed)

Angela Linn (Panelist)
Head of Anthropology Collection
University of Alaska Fairbanks

Fairbanks, AS
ajlinn@alaska.edu

(not confirmed)

/proposals/533/